the highs & lows of the favicon
August 8th, 2008 in Design![]()
that little 16 x 16 pixel square that sits in the url bar to the left of the website address isn’t very important to some people, to others – it’s something to sweat over, discuss and argue over. google changed their favicon a couple of months ago, i noticed to be honest wondered why they changed it, i wasn’t impressed with the new design and thought the old design was better – but that’s where it stopped. a few other people went a bit further, quite a few actually – i did a google search for ‘google changes favicon‘ and got back over 810,000 results.
the reason i started this post was that earlier this evening i was updating my site and adding some links from a couple of design networking websites that i have been signing myself up to recently, namely behance network, linked in and coroflot. so far coroflot is my favourite for functionality and design – but that’s another post, the one thing that coroflot does let itself down on is their favicon. it seems like it has no relevance to the website, it’s a pair or cherries that is not featured anywhere else on the website – it’s not part of their logo, the colour of the cherries isn’t even a part of the site’s colour scheme. i use the favicon’s on my site as bullet points, but decided against using the cherries from the coroflot site and used an upside-down heart that they use on their banners and badges (see above).
you can check out what’s hot and what’s not in the world of favicon design here [http://thefavicongallery.com] and if you want to have a go at creating one, i use and recommend this website; http://tools.dynamicdrive.com/favicon.


i’ve just finished reading this intriguing story about how 2 very clever university students came up with a better idea to search the internet, and turned it into the world wide webs most powerful brand. the book covers everything from the tech side of things to how they got funding from early investors right up until their historic ipo.
